enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Developing a list of sources that have gained ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Developing_a...

    Sometimes editors working on a contentious topic article or a group of similar articles will find it helpful to develop a list of sources that have gained consensus as being among the best sources for that subject. This is usually the result of a long discussion among multiple editors and may involve discussions of the quality of the sources ...

  3. Scientific consensus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus

    There are many philosophical and historical theories as to how scientific consensus changes over time. Because the history of scientific change is extremely complicated, and because there is a tendency to project "winners" and "losers" onto the past in relation to the current scientific consensus, it is very difficult to come up with accurate and rigorous models for scientific change. [17]

  4. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    FREE Resources: 3 articles every 2 weeks (Register and Read Program, archived journals). Also, early journals (prior to 1923 in US, 1870 elsewhere) free, no registry necessary. Free and Subscription JSTOR [89] Jurn: Multidisciplinary Jurn is a free-to-use online search tool for finding and downloading free full-text scholarly works.

  5. Help:Find sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Find_sources

    However, it is possible to use the open web to find many good sources to use in writing encyclopedia articles. Examples of such sources are news stories from newspapers with a reputation for accuracy, books which have previews on digital libraries, and academic papers which are available open access in open archives .

  6. Wikipedia:Consensus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CONSENSUS

    Limit article talk page discussions to discussion of sources, article focus, and policy. If an edit is challenged, or is likely to be challenged, editors should use talk pages to explain why an addition, change, or removal improves the article, and hence the encyclopedia. Consensus can be assumed if no editors object to a change.

  7. Wikipedia:Scientific consensus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Scientific_consensus

    Review articles, especially those printed in academic review journals that survey the literature, can help clarify academic consensus. Articles that discuss the existence of a controversy (be it scientific, interdisciplinary, popular, political, or religious) should clearly identify proponents of minority views and explain the extent and ...

  8. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources, and must accurately reflect current knowledge.This guideline supports the general sourcing policy with specific attention to what is appropriate for medical content in any Wikipedia article, including those on alternative medicine.

  9. Wikipedia:Journal sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Journal_sources

    Find this article at JURN, a curated search engine for free academic articles and books; Find this article at OpenDOAR, a search engine for academic repositories; Find this article in the DOAJ, a multidisciplinary index of open-access journal content; Find this article at CORE, an aggregator of open-access research; Find this article at PubMed ...