Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Designer Guild Limited v. Russell Williams (Textiles) Limited , [ 1 ] is a leading House of Lords case on what constitutes copying in copyright infringement cases. [ 2 ] The House of Lords considered whether there was infringement of a fabric design.
Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd This page was last edited on 4 December 2014, at 08:15 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike ...
Bednash v Hearsey; Belmont Finance Corp Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2) Bhullar v Bhullar; Binions v Evans; Birmingham Midshires Mortgage Services Ltd v Sabherwal; Birmingham Six; Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan; Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell (No 2) Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool BC; Bolton v Mahadeva
British Airways v Williams [2010] UKSC 16 24 March Labour law: Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine: R (F) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 17 21 April Sexual Offences Act 2003; Article 8, ECHR: Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine: Farstad Supply v Enviroco [2010] UKSC 18 5 May Negligence: Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Menashe Business Mercantile Ltd. & Anor v William Hill Organization Ltd. [2002] EWCA Civ 1702 was a patent case regarding Internet usage. The case addressed a European patent covering the United Kingdom for an invention referred to as "Interactive, computerized gaming system with remote control".
In Bridges v Mees [1957] Ch. 475, Harman J. decided that a purchaser of land under a contract for sale, who had paid the price and so was entitled to the land in equity, could acquire an overriding interest by virtue of actual occupation, and a similar position was held by the Court of Appeal to arise in relation to a resulting trust (Hodgson v ...
Ms Williams claimed redundancy six weeks into a trial period as manager of an optical store, after the dental clinic which she had previously managed closed. She had agreed to a four-week trial under ERA 1996 section 138 with reservations and asked for confirmation, when she began the trial in the new post, that she could still get redundancy ...
Williams v. Reed, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that state laws requiring exhaustion of state administrative remedies are preempted by 42 U.S.C. § 1983 of the federal Ku Klux Klan Act when they prevent a state court from hearing claims challenging delays in the administrative process.