Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The letter became a centerpiece of the White House effort to pass the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act through Congress in March 2010. [16] After the passage of the law, her letter was framed and hung on the wall outside the President's private office.
Restraining and personal protection order laws vary from one jurisdiction to another but all establish who can file for an order, what protection or relief a person can get from such an order, and how the order will be enforced. The court will order the adverse party to refrain from certain actions or require compliance with certain provisions.
A court order is an official proclamation by a judge (or panel of judges) that defines the legal relationships between the parties to a hearing, a trial, an appeal or other court proceedings. [1] Such ruling requires or authorizes the carrying out of certain steps by one or more parties to a case.
Secret Service [42] Federal Air Marshal Service [43] Federal Protective Service [44] Coast Guard Investigative Service [45] Department of State. Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) [46] Department of Justice. Marshals Service [47] FBI Police [48] Department of Defense. Air Force Office of Special Investigations; Army Criminal Investigation ...
A gag order (also known as a gagging order or suppression order) is an order, typically a legal order by a court or government, restricting information or comment from being made public or passed onto any unauthorized third party. The phrase may sometimes be used of a private order by an employer or other institution.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
This page was last edited on 18 February 2009, at 06:12 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled on the issue of whether the government's grant of immunity from prosecution can compel a witness to testify over an assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.