enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gonzales v. Raich - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich

    Gonzales v. Raich (previously Ashcroft v.Raich), 545 U.S. 1 (2005), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that, under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Congress may criminalize the production and use of homegrown cannabis even if state law allows its use for medicinal purposes.

  3. Wikipedia : Peer review/Gonzales v. Raich/archive1

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Gonzales_v._Raich/archive1

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  4. Robert Raich - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Raich

    Robert Raich is an American attorney. He served as legal counsel in the only two medical cannabis cases heard by the United States Supreme Court: United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative in 2001 and Gonzales v. Raich in 2004. [1]: 138 His spouse at the time, Angel Raich, was a party in the latter case.

  5. Sisters sue EspaƱola over traffic stop they say was illegal

    www.aol.com/news/sisters-sue-espa-ola-over...

    Jan. 8—Two Rio Arriba County sisters have filed lawsuits against the city of Española, contending they were subjected to an illegal traffic stop after a surveillance camera mistakenly flagged ...

  6. List of United States Supreme Court immigration case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of Supreme Court of the United States cases in the area of immigration law and naturalization law.. This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying immigration and naturalization law.

  7. Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2010 October 19 ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/...

    Why are some cases, such as United States v. Lopez, titled with the name of the US whereas other cases, such as Gonzales v. Raich, are titled with the attorney general's name? TIA, 76.78.154.197 04:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC) I'm not especially familiar with Gonzales v.

  8. Antonin Scalia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonin_Scalia

    In 2005, Scalia concurred in Gonzales v. Raich, which read the Commerce Clause to hold that Congress could ban the use of marijuana even when states approve its use for medicinal purposes. Scalia opined that the Commerce Clause, together with the Necessary and Proper Clause, permitted the regulation.

  9. Gonzales v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Oregon

    Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which ruled that the United States Attorney General cannot enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against physicians who prescribed drugs, in compliance with Oregon state law, to terminally ill patients seeking to end their lives, commonly referred to as assisted suicide. [1]