enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revocation_of_the_special...

    A map of the disputed Kashmir region showing the areas under Indian, Pakistani, and Chinese administration. On 5 August 2019, the government of India revoked the special status, or autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state which consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of dispute ...

  3. Article 370 of the Constitution of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_370_of_the...

    Former prince regent and Congress leader Karan Singh opined that an integral review of Article 370 was overdue and, it need to be worked on jointly with the State of Jammu and Kashmir. [90] However, in October 2015, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir ruled that the Article 370 cannot be "abrogated, repealed or even amended." It explained that ...

  4. The dirty secret of California's legal weed - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/dirty-secret-californias-legal...

    The social media post is part of"Real CA Cannabis," a $5-million taxpayer-funded campaign to promote California cannabis as safe, tested and "regulated by the state to protect consumers." In ...

  5. Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_California_Review...

    The Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice (RLSJ) promotes the discussion and examination of issues lying at the intersection of social justice and the law. RLSJ publishes legal narratives and analyses of case law and legislation that address the law's interaction with historically underrepresented groups and highlight the law's ...

  6. Robinson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinson_v._California

    Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), is the first landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution was interpreted to prohibit criminalization of particular acts or conduct, as contrasted with prohibiting the use of a particular form of punishment for a crime.

  7. Why it's been so hard to kill Article 34, California's ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/why-hard-kill-article-34...

    Why it's been so hard to kill Article 34, California's 'racist' barrier to affordable housing March 14, 2022 at 6:56 PM An aerial view of Whittier Blvd. and Arizona Ave. in East Los Angeles.

  8. Moore v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Regents_of_the...

    Regents of the University of California was a landmark Supreme Court of California decision. Filed on July 9, 1990, it dealt with the issue of property rights to one's own cells taken in samples by doctors or researchers. In 1976, John Moore was treated for hairy cell leukemia by physician David Golde, a cancer researcher at the UCLA Medical ...

  9. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of...

    National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 585 U.S. 755 (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the constitutionality of California's FACT Act, which mandated that crisis pregnancy centers provide certain disclosures about state services.