enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vi coactus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi_coactus

    Vi coactus (V.C.) is a Latin term meaning "having been forced" or "having been compelled". In Latin, cōgō means "I compel" or "I force". The passive participle of cōgō is coāctus, meaning "having been forced" or "having been compelled" or "coerced" . [1] "Vi coactus" or "V.C." is used with a signature to indicate that the signer was under ...

  3. Supremacy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause

    In Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816), and Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821), the Supreme Court held that the Supremacy Clause and the judicial power granted in Article III give the Supreme Court the ultimate power to review state court decisions involving issues arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States ...

  4. Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-fifth_Amendment_to...

    Section 2 provides a mechanism for filling a vacancy in the vice presidency. Before the Twenty-fifth Amendment, a vice-presidential vacancy continued until a new vice president took office at the start of the next presidential term; the vice presidency had become vacant several times due to death, resignation, or succession to the presidency, and these vacancies had often lasted several years.

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 296

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Klamath and Moadoc Tribes of Indians v. United States: 296 U.S. 244 (1935) Butler 8-0[b] none none certiorari to the United States Court of Claims (Ct. Cl.) judgment affirmed Miller v. Irving Trust Company: 296 U.S. 256 (1935) Butler 9-0 none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (2d Cir.) judgment affirmed

  6. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil...

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (No. 05-1126) (2007) (citations, internal quotation marks and footnote omitted). 12(b)(6) is the second of three procedural "hurdles" a cause of action must surmount before it gets to a trial (the first are the two jurisdictional dismissals, found in 12 (b)(1) and (2), and the third ...

  7. Regulation S-X - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_S-X

    Regulation S-X and the Financial Reporting Releases (Staff Accounting Bulletins) set forth the form and content of and requirements for financial statements required to be filed as a part of (a) registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933 and (b) registration statements under section 12, [2] annual or other reports under sections 13 [3] and 15(d) [4] and proxy and information ...

  8. Basic Inc. v. Levinson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Inc._v._Levinson

    Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States articulated the "fraud-on-the-market theory" as giving rise to a rebuttable presumption of reliance in securities fraud cases.

  9. McCarran–Ferguson Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarran–Ferguson_Act

    The McCarran–Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1011-1015, is a United States federal law that exempts the business of insurance from most federal regulation, including federal antitrust laws to a limited extent. The 79th Congress passed the McCarran–Ferguson Act in 1945 after the Supreme Court ruled in United States v.