Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Given the serious consequences that plagiarism has for students, there has been a call for a greater emphasis on learning in order to help students avoid committing plagiarism. [83] This is especially important when students move to a new institution that may have a different view of the concept when compared with the view previously developed ...
Plagiarism is taking credit for someone else's writing as your own, including their language and ideas, without providing adequate credit. [1] The University of Cambridge defines plagiarism as: "submitting as one's own work, irrespective of intent to deceive, that which derives in part or in its entirety from the work of others without due acknowledgement."
Citation analysis to detect plagiarism is a relatively young concept. It has not been adopted by commercial software, but a first prototype of a citation-based plagiarism detection system exists. [28] Similar order and proximity of citations in the examined documents are the main criteria used to compute citation pattern similarities.
A note on plagiarism Plagiarism is a scary word, and it's important to remember that it isn't a value judgment on you as a person. You might be thinking, "I'm a good person, I would never plagiarize!" But as you will see, many people plagiarize by mistake, or simply don't know all the rules.
A judge in Brazil has ordered Adele’s song Million Years Ago to be removed globally from streaming services due to a plagiarism claim by Brazilian composer, Toninho Geraes. Geraes alleges that ...
For example, an author may arrange a series of facts to support a theory for why a historical event occurred, but if the author could prevent others from using the same selection and arrangement of facts, the author would have an effective monopoly on the theory itself, which would run counter to US copyright law's prohibition on copyrighting ...
However, there have been a number of occasions when persons have failed to give the necessary attribution and attempted to pass off material from Wikipedia as their own work. Such plagiarism is a violation of the Creative Commons license and, when discovered, can be a reason for embarrassment, professional sanctions, or legal issues.
I believe removing the cite for an ancillary reason like that could constitute plagiarism if the original editor relied on that source when developing the content. The exception would be if the cited text was general knowledge in the subject area, so the original citation source was only for verifiability and was not actually a source of ...