Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This template is a customized wrapper for the infobox template {{Infobox court case}}. Any field from {{Infobox court case}} can work so long as it is added to this template first. Questions? Just ask over at Template talk:Infobox court case while referencing Template:Infobox California Supreme Court case.
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population. Along with Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v.
The "California Style Manual" has been adopted by the California Supreme Court as the official guide for styling citations in their state. [2] The Texas Greenbook is the guide to rules for citing legal authorities in that state. [3] Other states may have their own style manuals.
This field can contain citations to prior decisions in the case, in trial court or lower appellate courts, or prior decisions by the subject court; these should be preceded by a two to four word description of the ruling—this (together with the subsequent history, following) is merely the bare bones procedural history of the case—what ...
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted the Town's motion for summary judgment. [30] The church then appealed that ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court, holding the town's ordinance was content neutral. [30] Citing Hill v.
(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear a bid by fuel producers to challenge California's standards for vehicle emissions and electric cars under a federal air pollution law in ...
The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ...
460 U.S. 605 (1983): The court issued a decree regarding unadjudicated rights of Indian tribes to Colorado River water. 466 U.S. 144 (1984): The court adjusted its previous decree. 531 U.S. 1 (2000): The court adjusted the specified amounts of water for several parties to the case. 547 U.S. 150 (2006): The court approved a consolidated decree.