enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shareholder oppression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_oppression

    Shareholder oppression occurs when the majority shareholders in a corporation take action that unfairly prejudices the minority. It most commonly occurs in non-publicly traded companies, because the lack of a public market for shares leaves minority shareholders particularly vulnerable, since minority shareholders cannot escape mistreatment by selling their stock and exiting the corporation. [1]

  3. Foss v Harbottle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foss_v_Harbottle

    Because Foss v Harbottle leaves the minority in an unprotected position, exceptions have arisen and statutory provisions have come into being which provide some protection for the minority. By far and away the most important protection is the unfair prejudice action in ss. 994-6 of the Companies Act 2006 (UK) (s 232 Corporations Act 2001 in ...

  4. Smith v Croft (No 2) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v_Croft_(No_2)

    Smith v Croft (No 2) [1988] Ch 114 is a UK company law case concerning derivative claims. Its principle that in allowing a derivative claim to continue the court will have regard to the majority of the minority's views has been codified in Companies Act 2006 , section 263(4).

  5. Shareholders' agreement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholders'_agreement

    greater flexibility; the shareholders may anticipate that the company's business requires regular changes to their arrangements, and it may be unwieldy to repeatedly amend the corporate constitution. corporate law in the relevant country may not provide sufficient protection for minority shareholders, who may seek to better protect their ...

  6. City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Richmond_v._J.A...

    City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the minority set-aside program of Richmond, Virginia, which gave preference to minority business enterprises (MBE) in the awarding of municipal contracts, was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.

  7. A federal judge has ordered a US minority business agency to ...

    www.aol.com/news/federal-judge-ordered-us...

    A federal judge in Texas has ordered a 55-year-old U.S. agency that caters to minority-owned businesses to serve people regardless of race, siding with white business owners who claimed the ...

  8. Tesla Describes Itself As 'Majority-Minority' Company In ...

    www.aol.com/news/tesla-describes-itself-majority...

    Many of our programs in 2021 will focus on increasing Black and African American representation, especially in leadership, while continuing the upward trend in new hires and promotions," the ...

  9. Blocking minority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_minority

    The Companies Act 2006 in the United Kingdom gives minority shareholders certain rights. Minority shareholder protections in United States corporate law may amount to a blocking minority. Voting in the Council of the European Union uses 'qualified majority voting', which means that a significant minority of countries and populations may block a ...