enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reasonable expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_expectation_of...

    The reasonable expectation of privacy is crucial in distinguishing a legitimate, reasonable police search and seizure from an unreasonable one. A "search" occurs for purposes of the Fourth Amendment when the Government violates a person's "reasonable expectation of privacy". [3] In Katz v.

  3. Third-party doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine

    The third-party doctrine is a United States legal doctrine that holds that people who voluntarily give information to third parties—such as banks, phone companies, internet service providers (ISPs), and e-mail servers—have "no reasonable expectation of privacy" in that information.

  4. Exclusionary rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_rule

    Private search doctrine: Evidence unlawfully obtained from the defendant by a private person is admissible. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect privacy rights, with the Fourth Amendment applying specifically to government officials.

  5. Johnson v. United States (1948 Fourth Amendment case)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._United_States...

    Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 (1948), was a significant United States Supreme Court decision addressing search warrants and the Fourth Amendment.In this case, where federal agents had probable cause to search a hotel room but did not obtain a warrant, the Court declared the search was "unreasonable."

  6. United States v. Miller (1976) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller_(1976)

    United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court that held that bank records are not subject to protection under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [1] The case, along with Smith v. Maryland, established the principle of the third-party doctrine in relation to privacy rights.

  7. Oliver v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_v._United_States

    [A]n individual may not legitimately demand privacy for activities conducted out of doors in fields, except in the area immediately surrounding the home...The [Fourth] Amendment reflects the recognition of the Framers that certain enclaves should be free from arbitrary government interference. For example, the Court since the enactment of the ...

  8. Katz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v._United_States

    Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  9. Informational self-determination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informational_self...

    In contrast, the "right to privacy" in the United States legal tradition is commonly considered to originate in Warren and Brandeis' article, which focuses on the right to "solitude" (i.e., being "left alone") and in the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which protects persons and their belongings from warrantless search.

  1. Related searches private search doctrine pdf example free printable version constitution pdf

    private search exclusionary rulesthe inevitable discovery doctrine