enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Holistic grading - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holistic_grading

    When a group of college composition teachers were asked for their "criteria for evaluation" of writing, they mentioned not 5 or 6 criteria but 124. [68] While the rubric assumes that criteria are independent of one another, studies have shown that the scores readers give to one or two criteria influence the scores they give to the other ...

  3. Writing assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writing_Assessment

    Writing assessment refers to an area of study that contains theories and practices that guide the evaluation of a writer's performance or potential through a writing task. Writing assessment can be considered a combination of scholarship from composition studies and measurement theory within educational assessment . [ 1 ]

  4. Automated essay scoring - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_essay_scoring

    Jill Burstein was the team leader in its development. ETS's Criterion Online Writing Evaluation Service uses the e-rater engine to provide both scores and targeted feedback. Lawrence Rudner has done some work with Bayesian scoring, and developed a system called BETSY (Bayesian Essay Test Scoring sYstem). [11]

  5. Corpus linguistics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_linguistics

    Corpus linguistics is an empirical method for the study of language by way of a text corpus (plural corpora). [1] Corpora are balanced, often stratified collections of authentic, "real world", text of speech or writing that aim to represent a given linguistic variety. [1] Today, corpora are generally machine-readable data collections.

  6. Source criticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticism

    Source criticism (or information evaluation) is the process of evaluating an information source, i.e.: a document, a person, a speech, a fingerprint, a photo, an observation, or anything used in order to obtain knowledge. In relation to a given purpose, a given information source may be more or less valid, reliable or relevant.

  7. Levels of adequacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levels_of_adequacy

    These levels constitute a taxonomy of theories (a grammar of a natural language being an example of such a theory) according to validation. This taxonomy might be extended to scientific theories in general, and from there even stretched into the field of the aesthetics of art. [ 1 ]

  8. Wikipedia:WikiProject Writing/Assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    This quality assessment criteria has been developed by WikiProject articles for creation as a standard guidelines for quality assessment. WikiProject Writing has placed article examples for several examples sections of the criteria, but we still need help improving articles to featured article status and featured list status.

  9. Critical reading - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_reading

    For example, chapter 6 is about "Recognizing the many voices in a text". The practical advises given are based on textual theory (Mikhail Bakhtin and Julia Kristeva). Chapter 8 is titled "Evaluating the book as a whole: The book review", and the first heading is "books as tools".