Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rather than taking action to put out the fire, he moved to a different room; the fire went on to cause extensive damage to the cost of £800. [2] He was subsequently convicted of arson, under Sections 1 and 3 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971. Miller's defence was that there was no actus reus coinciding with mens rea. Although his reckless ...
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [1] is a United Kingdom constitutional law case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017, which ruled that the British Government (the executive) might not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union ...
Due to the significance of the case, the maximum eleven of the twelve Supreme Court justices sat to hear the appeal, [28] with Lord Briggs not sitting to ensure an odd number of judges. The case was only the second case heard by eleven justices in the Supreme Court's history; the first was R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the ...
Miller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 507 F.2d 759 (3d Cir. 1974), is a United States corporate law case that established that a corporate board cannot claim protection of the business judgment rule in a shareholder suit if the decision at issue was a knowing violation of public law. [1]
James Rual Miller was the owner of San Francisco Scrap Metals Inc, a company which purchased scrap wires in bulk, stripped them, and resold them for profit. [1] [2] Miller was charged with violating 3 counts of mail fraud (18 U.S.C. 1341) when on July 15, 1981, he reported 201,000 pounds of copper wire were stolen from his business to the police, and subsequently to his business insurance ...
Mica Miller Credit - Mica Miller Obituary. T he news that local North Carolina investigators tapped the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the FBI while looking into the death of Mica Miller, a 30-year ...
"Why are you yelling?” the reporter asked as Trump's senior adviser refused to clarify the source of information he was spreading about Venezuela’s crime rate.
United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (National Firearms Act); Adams v. Williams (1972); (dissenting opinion of Douglas, joined by Marshall) The leading case is United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174, upholding a federal law making criminal the shipment in interstate commerce of a sawed-off shotgun. The law was upheld, there being no evidence ...