Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Gunn Enli identifies the Internet's effect on public opinion as being “characterised by an intensified personalisation of political advocacy and increased anti-elitism, popularisation and populism”. [16] Public opinion has become more varied as a result of online news sources being influenced by political communication and agenda setting.
Propaganda is understood as a form of manipulation of public opinion. The semiotic manipulation of signs is the essential characteristic ( "Propaganda is a major form of manipulation by symbols" ). [ 5 ]
Public Opinion is a book by Walter Lippmann published in 1922. It is a critical assessment of functional democratic government, especially of the irrational and often self-serving social perceptions that influence individual behavior and prevent optimal societal cohesion . [ 1 ]
Each survey consists of approximately 1,000 completed interviews among U.S. adults using a sample selected from YouGov’s opt-in online panel of all 50 states plus the District of Columbia to match the demographics and other characteristics of the adult U.S. population. This methodology differs from a traditional telephone poll in a number of ...
The third pathway refers to biographical characteristics that influence a politician's resource allocation and responses based on characteristics such as race or gender. The fourth pathway is how a politician's biography affects his public perception, which affects politicians' leadership style and their strategy for gaining people's respect. [38]
Spiral of silence illustrated in Spanish. The spiral of silence theory is a political science and mass communication theory which states that an individual's perception of the distribution of public opinion influences that individual's willingness to express their own opinions.
Democracy garners considerable legitimacy in the modern world, [12] as public opinion across regions tends to strongly favor democratic systems of government relative to alternatives, [13] [14] and as even authoritarian states try to present themselves as democratic.
For example, a 2016–2017 survey of public opinion on CRISPR gene editing technology showed a "relatively broad consensus among all groups in support of the idea that the scientific community 'should consult with the public before applying gene editing to humans,'" providing a "broad mandate for public engagement." [19]