Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Editorials are typically published on a dedicated page, called the editorial page, which often features letters to the editor from members of the public; the page opposite this page is called the op-ed page and frequently contains opinion pieces (hence the name think pieces) by writers not directly affiliated with the publication. However, a ...
Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Editorial page
Some examples of Wikipedia's editorial control system at work: AFD ('Articles for Deletion') discussions, in which editors of all views can examine an article critically to discuss (independent of subject matter) whether it is policy compliant, or should be removed for failure to meet content criteria. AFD:Liza Wright, AFD:Stephanie Sarkis.
The "Page Op.", created in 1921 by Herbert Bayard Swope of The New York Evening World, is a possible precursor to the modern op-ed. [4] When Swope took over as main editor in 1920, he opted to designate a page from editorial staff as "a catchall for book reviews, society boilerplate, and obituaries". [5]
Editorial discretion allows editors to evaluate sources, balance claims, and otherwise distill bodies of information into accurate, verifiable and comprehensive articles; accordingly with the neutral point of view policy, we need to accord appropriate weight to all information we include, to make sure we represent a topic properly and without distorting emphasis on any one part.
This page in a nutshell: Editors, sources, and fields can have a point of view and original research, and even some edits can have a POV, as long as the article in Wikipedia does not. Having a strong POV is fine and you can report it from a source, but also other POVs may be reported from sourcing.
Many users of Wikipedia consult the page history of an article in order to assess the number, and the perspective, of people who contributed to the article. You may also consult the talk page of any article to see what other readers and editors have to say about it. Wikipedia's best articles are highlighted in the list of featured articles.
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons – about how editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Wikipedia:Five pillars – the fundamental principles of Wikipedia summarized in five "pillars". Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not – the page outlines certain things that Wikipedia is not.