enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Material implication (rule of inference) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_implication_(rule...

    An example: we are given the conditional fact that if it is a bear, then it can swim. Then, all 4 possibilities in the truth table are compared to that fact. If it is a bear, then it can swim — T; If it is a bear, then it can not swim — F; If it is not a bear, then it can swim — T because it doesn’t contradict our initial fact.

  3. Contraposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition

    The symbol for material implication signifies the proposition as a hypothetical, or the "if–then" form, e.g. "if P, then Q". The biconditional statement of the rule of transposition (↔) refers to the relation between hypothetical (→) propositions , with each proposition including an antecedent and consequential term.

  4. Necessity and sufficiency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_and_sufficiency

    The assertion that Q is necessary for P is colloquially equivalent to "P cannot be true unless Q is true" or "if Q is false, then P is false". [9] [1] By contraposition, this is the same thing as "whenever P is true, so is Q". The logical relation between P and Q is expressed as "if P, then Q" and denoted "P ⇒ Q" (P implies Q).

  5. Implicational propositional calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicational...

    Implication alone is not functionally complete as a logical operator because one cannot form all other two-valued truth functions from it.. For example, the two-place truth function that always returns false is not definable from → and arbitrary propositional variables: any formula constructed from → and propositional variables must receive the value true when all of its variables are ...

  6. Proof by contradiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_contradiction

    The proposition to be proved is P. We assume P to be false, i.e., we assume ¬P. It is then shown that ¬P implies falsehood. This is typically accomplished by deriving two mutually contradictory assertions, Q and ¬Q, and appealing to the law of noncontradiction. Since assuming P to be false leads to a contradiction, it is concluded that P is ...

  7. Destructive dilemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destructive_dilemma

    It is the inference that, if P implies Q and R implies S and either Q is false or S is false, then either P or R must be false. In sum, if two conditionals are true, but one of their consequents is false, then one of their antecedents has to be false. Destructive dilemma is the disjunctive version of modus tollens.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Propositional calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

    Download as PDF; Printable version; ... No formula is both true and false under the same interpretation. [69] [79] ... If p then q; and if p then r ...