Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ... Ontario Ranch, California; City of Ontario v. Quon; Ontario-Montclair School District; OVS (gang) P. Phoenix ...
The principal term of contract A was the irrevocability of the bid and the corollary term was the obligation in both parties to enter into a construction contract, contract B, upon the acceptance of the tender. [3] The deposit was required to ensure the performance by the contractor-tenderer of its obligations under contract A.
North Ontario broke away from the city in 1906, calling itself Upland. [29] In 1912, the streetcar line became the Upland–Ontario Line of Pacific Electric. It was closed in 1928. In 1929, the city of Ontario established the Ontario Municipal Airport. This is now the Ontario International Airport, and is the largest employer in the city.
The OIAA was created in August 2012 under a joint-powers agreement between the City of Ontario, California, and San Bernardino County. [1] The OIAA oversees the operation of Ontario International Airport, having gained operational control of the airport from Los Angeles World Airports on November 1, 2016. [2]
Ontario Ranch is a master-planned community located in the southern portion of the city of Ontario, California. It is the largest master-planned community in Southern California. [ 1 ] The community is located south of E. Riverside Drive, north of Eastvale , and between Euclid and Milliken Avenues, 2 miles west of Interstate 15 (the Ontario ...
Bidder Conferences are common for major projects and programs that are intended to be performed as Cross-Corporate Project Business activities. They are used once the owners of the project have decided to buy work items from the sellers, who may be product vendors and/or service providers.
The Windsor City Council is the governing body of Windsor, Ontario, Canada. The council consists of the mayor plus ten elected city councillors (one per ward) representing the city as a whole. 2006–2010
The judge dismissed the case because there was "no limitation" on the statements that a city council member could make during a meeting. [20] The decision was upheld by a District Court of Appeals in January 1956 [21] and later by the California Supreme Court. [22]