enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Allahabad High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahabad_High_Court

    On 25 February 1948, the Chief Court of Oudh was amalgamated with the High Court of Allahabad. Until 2000, what is now called Uttarakhand was part of Uttar Pradesh, and was therefore subject to the jurisdiction of Allahabad High Court. When the new state was created, Allahabad High Court ceased to have jurisdiction over the districts in it.

  3. Poonam Rani v. State of Uttar Pradesh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poonam_Rani_v._State_of...

    Moreover, the Bench reiterated the precedent set by the Allahabad High Court in the case of Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020). This Court, being a Constitutional Court, is duty bound to monitor and observe Constitutional morality, as well as the rights of citizens that are under threat only on account of sexual orientation.

  4. High courts of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_courts_of_India

    Thus cases built up during this interim period are judged when the circuit court is in session. According to a study conducted by Bangalore-based N.G.O, Daksh, on 21 high courts in collaboration with the Ministry of Law and Justice in March 2015, it was found that average pendency of a case in high courts in India is 3 years. [2]

  5. Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultana_Mirza_v._State_of...

    A two-judge Bench of the Allahabad High Court, invoked the Supreme Court precedent set by Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) , highlighted that individuals belonging to the queer community possess the same constitutional rights as all other citizens, encompassing protected liberties and equal citizenship, devoid of discrimination, and ...

  6. Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_NCT_of_Delhi...

    Government of NCT of Delhi versus Union of India & Another [C. A. No. 2357 of 2017] is a civil appeal heard before the Supreme Court of India by a five-judge constitution bench of the court. The case was filed as an appeal to an August 2016 verdict of the Delhi High Court that ruled that the lieutenant governor of Delhi exercised "complete ...

  7. E-courts In India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-courts_In_India

    The e-Courts project [1] was conceptualized on the basis of the National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation of information and communication technology (ICT) in the Indian Judiciary–2005 submitted by e-Committee (Supreme Court of India), with a vision to transform the Indian Judiciary by ICT enablement of Courts. In other words, the e ...

  8. 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Supreme_Court_verdict...

    The Allahabad High Court bench began hearing the case in 2002, which was completed in 2010. After the Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea to defer the High Court verdict, [ 9 ] on 30 September 2010, the High Court of Allahabad, the three-member bench comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D. V. Sharma, ruled that the disputed ...

  9. Delhi High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhi_High_Court

    This was achieved by enacting the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 on 5 September 1966. The High Court of Delhi initially exercised jurisdiction not only over the Union Territory of Delhi, but also Himachal Pradesh. The High Court of Delhi had a Himachal Pradesh Bench at Shimla in a building called Ravenswood. The High Court of Delhi continued to ...