Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A necessary condition for an integer to equal such a sum is that cannot equal 4 or 5 modulo 9, because the cubes modulo 9 are 0, 1, and −1, and no three of these numbers can sum to 4 or 5 modulo 9. [1] It is unknown whether this necessary condition is sufficient.
In mathematics, summation is the addition of a sequence of numbers, called addends or summands; the result is their sum or total.Beside numbers, other types of values can be summed as well: functions, vectors, matrices, polynomials and, in general, elements of any type of mathematical objects on which an operation denoted "+" is defined.
9 is the sum of the cubes of the first two non-zero positive integers + which makes it the first cube-sum number greater than one. [5] A number that is 4 or 5 modulo 9 cannot be represented as the sum of three cubes. [6]
G(3) is at least 4 (since cubes are congruent to 0, 1 or −1 mod 9); for numbers less than 1.3 × 10 9, 1 290 740 is the last to require 6 cubes, and the number of numbers between N and 2N requiring 5 cubes drops off with increasing N at sufficient speed to have people believe that G(3) = 4; [17] the largest number now known not to be a sum of ...
23 = 2 3 + 2 3 + 1 3 + 1 3 + 1 3 + 1 3 + 1 3 + 1 3 + 1 3. In rational numbers Every positive rational number is the sum of three positive rational cubes, [ 9 ] and there are rationals that are not the sum of two rational cubes.
Gauss [10] pointed out that the four squares theorem follows easily from the fact that any positive integer that is 1 or 2 mod 4 is a sum of 3 squares, because any positive integer not divisible by 4 can be reduced to this form by subtracting 0 or 1 from it. However, proving the three-square theorem is considerably more difficult than a direct ...
The sum within each gmonon is a cube, so the sum of the whole table is a sum of cubes. [7] Visual demonstration that the square of a triangular number equals a sum of cubes. In the more recent mathematical literature, Edmonds (1957) provides a proof using summation by parts. [8]
Most of the more elementary definitions of the sum of a divergent series are stable and linear, and any method that is both stable and linear cannot sum 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ to a finite value (see § Heuristics below). More advanced methods are required, such as zeta function regularization or Ramanujan summation.