Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Java Apache License 2.0 Java and C client, HTTP, FUSE [8] transparent master failover No Reed-Solomon [9] File [10] 2005 IPFS: Go Apache 2.0 or MIT HTTP gateway, FUSE, Go client, Javascript client, command line tool: Yes with IPFS Cluster: Replication [11] Block [12] 2015 [13] JuiceFS: Go Apache License 2.0 POSIX, FUSE, HDFS, S3: Yes Yes Reed ...
If G is a tree, replacing the queue of this breadth-first search algorithm with a stack will yield a depth-first search algorithm. For general graphs, replacing the stack of the iterative depth-first search implementation with a queue would also produce a breadth-first search algorithm, although a somewhat nonstandard one. [10]
We should either have only a pseudocode implementation, or maybe Python or some other reads-mostly-like-pseudocode language if it can be made sufficiently close to pseudocode. The fact that java.util.LinkedList is in the example suggests to me that the example says more about Java than about BFS. —Ben FrantzDale 12:53, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
The breadth-first-search algorithm is a way to explore the vertices of a graph layer by layer. It is a basic algorithm in graph theory which can be used as a part of other graph algorithms. For instance, BFS is used by Dinic's algorithm to find maximum flow in a graph.
Filesystem in Userspace (FUSE) is a software interface for Unix and Unix-like computer operating systems that lets non-privileged users create their own file systems without editing kernel code.
IDDFS achieves breadth-first search's completeness (when the branching factor is finite) using depth-first search's space-efficiency. If a solution exists, it will find a solution path with the fewest arcs. [2] Iterative deepening visits states multiple times, and it may seem wasteful.
Depth-first search (DFS) is an algorithm for traversing or searching tree or graph data structures. The algorithm starts at the root node (selecting some arbitrary node as the root node in the case of a graph) and explores as far as possible along each branch before backtracking.
The difference between a distributed file system and a distributed data store is that a distributed file system allows files to be accessed using the same interfaces and semantics as local files – for example, mounting/unmounting, listing directories, read/write at byte boundaries, system's native permission model. Distributed data stores, by ...