Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In mathematics and logic, the term "uniqueness" refers to the property of being the one and only object satisfying a certain condition. [1] This sort of quantification is known as uniqueness quantification or unique existential quantification, and is often denoted with the symbols "∃!" [2] or "∃ =1". For example, the formal statement
In predicate logic, an existential quantification is a type of quantifier, a logical constant which is interpreted as "there exists", "there is at least one", or "for some". It is usually denoted by the logical operator symbol ∃, which, when used together with a predicate variable, is called an existential quantifier (" ∃x" or "∃(x)" or ...
If E is a logical predicate, means that there exists at least one value of x for which E is true. 2. Often used in plain text as an abbreviation of "there exists". ∃! Denotes uniqueness quantification, that is, ! means "there exists exactly one x such that P (is true)".
Substance monism posits that only one kind of substance exists, although many things may be made up of this substance, e.g., matter or mind. Dual-aspect monism is the view that the mental and the physical are two aspects of, or perspectives on, the same substance.
! says “there exists exactly one such that has property .” Only ∀ {\displaystyle \forall } and ∃ {\displaystyle \exists } are part of formal logic. ∃ ! x {\displaystyle \exists !x} P ( x ) {\displaystyle P(x)} is an abbreviation for
The second is a link to the article that details that symbol, using its Unicode standard name or common alias. (Holding the mouse pointer on the hyperlink will pop up a summary of the symbol's function.); The third gives symbols listed elsewhere in the table that are similar to it in meaning or appearance, or that may be confused with it;
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
to disprove a "there exists an x" proposition, one needs to show that the predicate is false for all x. In classical logic, every formula is logically equivalent to a formula in prenex normal form, that is, a string of quantifiers and bound variables followed by a quantifier-free formula.