Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Domain-driven design (DDD) is a major software design approach, [1] focusing on modeling software to match a domain according to input from that domain's experts. [2] DDD is against the idea of having a single unified model; instead it divides a large system into bounded contexts, each of which have their own model.
The book Domain Driven Design describes some common uses for the above four layers, although its primary focus is the domain layer. [ 11 ] If the application architecture has no explicit distinction between the business layer and the presentation layer (i.e., the presentation layer is considered part of the business layer), then a traditional ...
The application domain model of the automated teller's business logic. The security domain model of various issues regarding system security (such as authentication and encryption). The data access domain model of methods for external data usage. The logging domain model of the various methods through which the system can or must log information.
The name Specification by Example was coined by Martin Fowler in 2004. [9] Specification by Example is an evolution of the Customer Test [10] practice of Extreme Programming proposed around 1997 and Ubiquitous Language [11] idea from Domain-driven design from 2004, using the idea of black-box tests as requirements described by Weinberg and ...
Domain-specific languages can usually cover a range of abstraction levels for a particular domain. For example, a domain-specific modeling language for mobile phones could allow users to specify high-level abstractions for the user interface, as well as lower-level abstractions for storing data such as phone numbers or settings. Likewise, a ...
Domain-specific multimodeling [1] is a software development paradigm where each view is made explicit as a separate domain-specific language (DSL). Successful development of a modern enterprise system requires the convergence of multiple views.
The objective of domain design is to satisfy as many domain requirements as possible while retaining the flexibility offered by the developed feature model. The architecture should be sufficiently flexible to satisfy all of the systems within the domain while rigid enough to provide a solid framework upon which to base the solution.
The anemic domain model is described as a programming anti-pattern where the domain objects contain little or no business logic like validations, calculations, rules, and so forth. The business logic is thus baked into the architecture of the program itself, making refactoring and maintenance more difficult and time-consuming.