enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Grutter v. Bollinger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grutter_v._Bollinger

    Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action in student admissions.The Court held that a student admissions process that favors "underrepresented minority groups" did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause so long as it took into account other factors evaluated on an individual ...

  3. Comcast v. National Association of African-American-Owned ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast_v._National...

    National Association of African-American-Owned Media, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), is a United States Supreme Court case related to protections against racial discrimination in the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The case relates to whether cable television operator Comcast engaged in racial discrimination in refusing to carry channels from Entertainment ...

  4. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    Institutions that receive federal funding, such as Harvard University, are subject to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlaws racial discrimination. [18] For years prior to the decision which took place in 2023, affirmative action in the United States was considered by some to be a wedge issue among Asian Americans.

  5. The post Former Tesla worker settles discrimination case, ending appeals over lowered $3.2 million verdict appeared first on TheGrio. ... number than the $137 million Diaz won in his first trial ...

  6. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    This case featured the first application of strict scrutiny to racial discrimination by the government. (Potentially overruled by Trump v. Hawaii (2018)) Morgan v. Virginia, 328 U.S. 373 (1946) A Virginia law that enforces segregation on interstate buses is unconstitutional. Shelley v.

  7. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_Corp._v...

    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), is a US employment law case by the United States Supreme Court regarding the burdens and nature of proof in proving a Title VII case and the order in which plaintiffs and defendants present proof. It was the seminal case in the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.

  8. In California's largest race bias cases, Latino workers are ...

    www.aol.com/news/californias-largest-race-bias...

    Over the last decade, the agency has won settlements in 171 race discrimination suits involving Black workers, 59 cases involving Latino victims, 12 involving Asian victims and six involving white ...

  9. Katzenbach v. McClung - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katzenbach_v._McClung

    Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which unanimously held that Congress acted within its power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution in forbidding racial discrimination in restaurants as this was a burden to interstate commerce.