enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center...

    Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneyard Shopping Center in Campbell, California, and several local high school students (who wished to canvass signatures for a petition against United ...

  3. Covenant (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_(law)

    A covenant can be terminated if the original purpose of the covenant is lost. In some cases property owners can petition a court to remove or modify the covenants, and homeowner associations may include procedures for removing the covenants. The covenant may be negative or affirmative. A negative covenant is one in which property owners are ...

  4. Rhone v Stephens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhone_v_Stephens

    Lord Templeman held that the covenant could not be enforced because the covenant was positive. His judgment said the following. [1]Equity cannot compel an owner to comply with a positive covenant entered into by his predecessors without flatly contradicting the common law rule that a person cannot be made liable upon a contract unless he was a party to it.

  5. California law requiring removal of racial covenants from ...

    www.aol.com/california-law-requiring-removal...

    Every county recorder in California will establish a program to identify and redact unlawfully restrictive covenants from the state’s real The post California law requiring removal of racial ...

  6. Blue pencil doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_pencil_doctrine

    In most jurisdictions, courts routinely "blue pencil" or reform covenants that are deemed not reasonable. The blue pencil doctrine gives courts the authority to strike unreasonable clauses from a non-compete agreement, leaving the rest to be enforced, or actually to modify the agreement to reflect the terms that the parties originally could have and probably should have agreed to. [3]

  7. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nollan_v._California...

    In Nollan v.California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), the United States Supreme Court ruled that a California Coastal Commission regulation which required private homeowners to dedicate a public easement along valuable beachfront property as a condition of approval for a construction permit to renovate their beach bungalow was unconstitutional.

  8. Oyama v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyama_v._California

    Oyama v. State of California, 332 U.S. 633 (1948) was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled that specific provisions of the 1913 and 1920 California Alien Land Laws abridged the rights and privileges guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to Fred Oyama, a U.S. citizen in whose name his father, a Japanese citizen, had purchased land.

  9. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!