enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Literature review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature_review

    Either way, a literature review is supposed to provide the researcher/author and the audiences with a general image of the existing knowledge on the topic under question. A good literature review can ensure that a proper research question has been asked and a proper theoretical framework and/or research methodology have been chosen. To be ...

  3. Wikipedia : WikiProject Military history/Assessment

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    The military history A-Class review process is the most thorough and demanding assessment of article quality done by the Military history WikiProject. An article that undergoes this process must be reviewed by at least three independent examiners, each of whom must agree that the article meets all of the A-Class criteria .

  4. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    Grey literature: 700,000 Indexes European grey literature: Free Institut de l'information scientifique et technique: ORCID [64] Multidisciplinary: An open and independent registry for contributor identification in research and academic publishing. List: biography, education, employment, works, grants, peer-review. Over 9.3 million profiles. Free

  5. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...

  6. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    For example, the European Accounting Review editors subject each manuscript to three questions to decide whether a manuscript moves forward to referees: 1) Is the article a fit for the journal's aims and scope, 2) is the paper content (e.g. literature review, methods, conclusions) sufficient and does the paper make a worthwhile contribution to ...

  7. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  8. The Historical Journal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Historical_Journal

    The Historical Journal, formerly known as The Cambridge Historical Journal, is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by Cambridge University Press.It publishes approximately thirty-five articles per year on all aspects of British, European, and world history since the fifteenth century.

  9. The English Historical Review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_English_Historical_Review

    The English Historical Review is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal that was established in 1886 [1] and published by Oxford University Press (formerly by Longman). It publishes articles on all aspects of history – British , European , and world history – since the classical era .