enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Logical conjunction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_conjunction

    Here is an example of an argument that fits the form conjunction introduction: Bob likes apples. Bob likes oranges. Therefore, Bob likes apples and Bob likes oranges. Conjunction elimination is another classically valid, simple argument form. Intuitively, it permits the inference from any conjunction of either element of that conjunction.

  3. Logical connective - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_connective

    Related puzzles involving disjunction include free choice inferences, Hurford's Constraint, and the contribution of disjunction in alternative questions. Other apparent discrepancies between natural language and classical logic include the paradoxes of material implication , donkey anaphora and the problem of counterfactual conditionals .

  4. Conjunction introduction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction_introduction

    Conjunction introduction (often abbreviated simply as conjunction and also called and introduction or adjunction) [1] [2] [3] is a valid rule of inference of propositional logic. The rule makes it possible to introduce a conjunction into a logical proof .

  5. Commutativity of conjunction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_conjunction

    In propositional logic, the commutativity of conjunction is a valid argument form and truth-functional tautology. It is considered to be a law of classical logic . It is the principle that the conjuncts of a logical conjunction may switch places with each other, while preserving the truth-value of the resulting proposition.

  6. T-norm fuzzy logics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-norm_fuzzy_logics

    In the context of substructural logics, the names additive, extensional, or comparative conjunction are sometimes used for lattice conjunction. In the logic BL and its extensions (though not in t-norm logics in general), weak conjunction is definable in terms of implication and strong conjunction, by A ∧ B ≡ A & ( A → B ) . {\displaystyle ...

  7. List of logic symbols - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logic_symbols

    The following table lists many common symbols, together with their name, how they should be read out loud, and the related field of mathematics. Additionally, the subsequent columns contains an informal explanation, a short example, the Unicode location, the name for use in HTML documents, [1] and the LaTeX symbol.

  8. First-order logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic

    Example requires a quantifier over predicates, which cannot be implemented in single-sorted first-order logic: Zj → ∃X(Xj∧Xp). Quantification over properties Santa Claus has all the attributes of a sadist. Example requires quantifiers over predicates, which cannot be implemented in single-sorted first-order logic: ∀X(∀x(Sx → Xx) → ...

  9. Conjunction elimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction_elimination

    In propositional logic, conjunction elimination (also called and elimination, ∧ elimination, [1] or simplification) [2] [3] [4] is a valid immediate inference, argument form and rule of inference which makes the inference that, if the conjunction A and B is true, then A is true, and B is true.