enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: derek parfit self defeat

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reasons and Persons - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasons_and_Persons

    Reasons and Persons is a 1984 book by the philosopher Derek Parfit, in which the author discusses ethics, rationality and personal identity. It is divided into four parts, dedicated to self-defeating theories, rationality and time, personal identity and responsibility toward future generations.

  3. Derek Parfit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek_Parfit

    Self-interest and consequentialism fail indirectly, while common-sense morality is directly collectively self-defeating. (So is self-interest, but self-interest is an individual theory.) Parfit showed, using interesting examples and borrowing from Nashian games, that it would often be better for us all if we did not put the welfare of our loved ...

  4. Teletransportation paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletransportation_paradox

    The teletransportation paradox or teletransport paradox (also known in alternative forms as the duplicates paradox) is a thought experiment on the philosophy of identity that challenges common intuitions on the nature of self and consciousness, formulated by Derek Parfit in his 1984 book Reasons and Persons. [1]

  5. Mere addition paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mere_addition_paradox

    The mere addition paradox (also known as the repugnant conclusion) is a problem in ethics identified by Derek Parfit and discussed in his book Reasons and Persons (1984). The paradox identifies the mutual incompatibility of four intuitively compelling assertions about the relative value of populations.

  6. Talk:Derek Parfit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Derek_Parfit

    This does not mean S is self-contradictory or anything but it is a strange result that might be seen as a problem with S. It is a familiar, though disputed, claim that utilitarianism is self-defeating in this same sense (Williams had some rather famous things to say about this). Parfit is showing that S has the same problem, if it is a problem.

  7. On What Matters - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_What_Matters

    The economist Tyler Cowen has expressed admiration for Parfit's style ("Reading him is an unforgettable and illuminating experience") in On What Matters, but argues: . I see the biggest and most central part of the book as a failure, possibly wrong but more worryingly "not even wrong" and simply missing the questions defined by where the frontier – choice theory and not just philosophic ...

  8. Self’s return to U of I ends in defeat, but no tears. ‘It ...

    www.aol.com/self-return-u-ends-defeat-022504166.html

    KU senior guard Kevin McCullar, who left the game with “some whiplash” in the final minute, according to Self, finished with 25 points on 9-of-14 shooting with eight rebounds in 35 minutes.

  9. Future self - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_self

    According to Parfit, it is rational for people who perceive very little connectedness with their future self to act in ways that neglect the future self (e.g., by smoking). The psychological work that followed did not similarly argue for Parfit's normative view but has instead attempted to test the descriptive validity of Parfit's theory. [6]

  1. Ad

    related to: derek parfit self defeat