enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. File:Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UKPGA 1977-50).pdf

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Unfair_Contract_Terms...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  3. R&B Customs Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R&B_Customs_Brokers_Co_Ltd...

    Dillon LJ held that the exclusion clause would have passed the reasonableness test under UCTA 1977 section 6(3), section 11 and Schedule 2. In fact the company was dealing as a consumer, and therefore section 6(2) applied to make the SGA 1979 mandatory; exclusion was not a possibility.

  4. Unfair terms in English contract law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_terms_in_English...

    The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 regulates clauses that exclude or limit terms implied by the common law or statute. Its general pattern is that if clauses restrict liability, particularly negligence , of one party, the clause must pass the "reasonableness test" in section 11 and Schedule 2.

  5. Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_Contract_Terms_Act_1977

    The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (c. 50) is an act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which regulates contracts by restricting the operation and legality of some contract terms. It extends to nearly all forms of contract and one of its most important functions is limiting the applicability of disclaimers of liability. The terms extend to ...

  6. St Albans City and DC v International Computers Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Albans_City_and_DC_v...

    The Salvage Association v CAP Financial Services Ltd [1995] FSR 655, failure to show evidence of why a particular limit is put in may lead to it being unreasonable; British Fermentation Products Ltd v Compair [1999] 2 All ER (Comm) 389, Judge Bowsher QC had some trouble with the ‘written standard terms of business’ line in UCTA 1977 s 3, holding that the industry's model forms of contract ...

  7. Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Gill_Ltd_v_Horatio...

    Lord Donaldson MR, noting there was "more than one way of killing a cat", held that clause 12.4 was within the scope of UCTA 1977 and it was unreasonable.He held that the purpose of section 13 was to stop precisely this variety of exemption clause: the 'no set off' provision in clause 12.4 had the same effect as an exemption clause because it purported to preclude a remedy for breach of ...

  8. Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_Terms_in_Consumer...

    In the complex case of Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank, [2] the bank's seemingly unfair interest term was found to be in good faith as the term guarded the bank from a possible situation of receiving no interest defeating their business objective. Schedule 2 sets out an indicative, non-exhaustive list of terms that would ...

  9. Messr UK Ltd v Britvic Soft Drinks Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messr_UK_Ltd_v_Britvic...

    A term in the contract limited liability of Messer under s 14 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (which by virtue of UCTA 1977 can only be limited as it satisfies the requirement of reasonableness). The judge found that the only relevant express term in the supply agreement was that the carbon dioxide would conform with British Standard 4105.