enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California to end Walgreens contract after abortion dispute - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/california-end-walgreens...

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday withdrew a $54 million contract with Walgreens after the pharmacy giant indicated it would not sell an abortion pill by mail in some conservative-led states.

  3. 9th Circuit sides with employers in dispute over California ...

    www.aol.com/news/9th-circuit-sides-employers...

    A California law barring employers from requiring their employees to resolve workplace complaints in private runs afoul of federal law, a federal court ruled.

  4. State retirees caught in middle of contract dispute between ...

    www.aol.com/state-retirees-caught-middle...

    This contract dispute would affect about 175,000 retired state employees enrolled in the plan. ... USA TODAY. John Capodice, 'Ace Ventura,' 'General Hospital' actor, dies at 83. Food.

  5. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Department_of...

    The court denied Activision-Blizzard's request to halt the suit in October 2021, but did grant them the ability to evaluate the ethics issue at the basis of the dispute. [46] The court also denied California's request to intervene in the EEOC suit by December 2021, allowing the settlement terms to stand. [47]

  6. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circuit_City_Stores,_Inc...

    Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case that concerned whether the "section one exemption" of the Federal Arbitration Act applied to an employment contract of an employee at Circuit City Stores. The Court held that the exemption was limited to the specific listing of professions contained ...

  7. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  8. Comcast blacks out 15 regional sports networks in contract ...

    www.aol.com/sports/comcast-blacks-15-regional...

    According to a study by Leichtman Research Group released last October, the percentage of U.S. households paying for such live TV services dropped to 64% in 2023 from 78% in 2018.

  9. Arizona v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._California

    If less water is available, the Secretary of the Interior must allocate the water according to various formulas (which were the subjects of the court cases) to ensure that each state receives a specified amount, with California receiving an absolute fixed maximum of 4,400,000 acre-feet (5.4 km 3) per year (376 U.S. 342). [2]