Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Since the Hamming distance between "000" and "111" is 3, and those comprise the entire set of codewords in the code, the minimum Hamming distance is 3, which satisfies 2k+1 = 3. Thus a code with minimum Hamming distance d between its codewords can detect at most d-1 errors and can correct ⌊(d-1)/2⌋ errors. [2]
In other words, the minimal Hamming distance between any two correct codewords is 3, ... (modulo 2) to a codeword of Hamming(7,4), and rescaling by 1/ ...
The only nontrivial and useful perfect codes are the distance-3 Hamming codes with parameters satisfying (2 r – 1, 2 r – 1 – r, 3), and the [23,12,7] binary and [11,6,5] ternary Golay codes. [4] [5] Another code property is the number of neighbors that a single codeword may have. [6] Again, consider pennies as an example.
Hamming also noticed the problems with flipping two or more bits, and described this as the "distance" (it is now called the Hamming distance, after him). Parity has a distance of 2, so one bit flip can be detected but not corrected, and any two bit flips will be invisible.
Linearity guarantees that the minimum Hamming distance d between a codeword c 0 and any of the other codewords c ≠ c 0 is independent of c 0. This follows from the property that the difference c − c 0 of two codewords in C is also a codeword (i.e., an element of the subspace C), and the property that d(c, c 0) = d(c − c 0, 0). These ...
where (,) is the Hamming distance between and . The expression (,) represents the maximum number of possible codewords in a binary code of length and minimum distance . The Plotkin bound places a limit on this expression.
These codes differ from most other codes in that they use arithmetic weight to maximize the arithmetic distance between codewords as opposed to the hamming weight and hamming distance. The arithmetic distance between two words is a measure of the number of errors made while computing an arithmetic operation.
The distance of a code is the minimum Hamming distance between any two distinct codewords, i.e., the minimum number of positions at which two distinct codewords differ. Since the Walsh–Hadamard code is a linear code, the distance is equal to the minimum Hamming weight among all of its non-zero codewords.