Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Fair Housing Act was passed at the urging of President Lyndon B. Johnson. Congress passed the federal Fair Housing Act (codified at 42 U.S.C. 3601-3619, penalties for violation at 42 U.S.C. 3631) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 only one week after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.
As early as 1927, the California Real Estate Association (the eventual sponsor of Proposition 14) began to advise its membership in ways to keep California communities all white. [5] This was part of a decades-long campaign by real estate interests to undercut the rights of minority groups in regard to housing facilities in California. [5]
[220] [222] The case against the Times and its journalists was dismissed in May 2023 on First Amendment grounds. [222] Trump was ordered to pay the legal costs of the New York Times and paid $392,000 in February 2024. [223] A ruling the next month allowed Donald to pursue his claim against Mary who appealed the ruling.
James is seeking $370 million in fines and is aiming to ban the former president from doing real estate business in the state for life. But not everyone thinks the case holds water. Don’t miss
President-elect Donald Trump's criminal hush money conviction in New York must be dismissed "to facilitate the orderly transition of Executive power," Trump's defense attorneys argued Wednesday in ...
Michael Sexton created a business plan for a real estate training program and presented it to Donald Trump, looking to pay Trump a flat fee for the use of his name. Trump instead decided he wanted to be the principal owner. [9] Trump University was incorporated in 2004 by Trump, Sexton, and Spitalny, as a New York limited liability company. [10]
Upon repudiation of a contract, either party can apply to the court. The court may order restitution, damages, or discharge the contract. All contracts involving the transfer of real estate are considered valid until ruled otherwise. A minor (typically under 18) can disaffirm a contract made, no matter the case. However, the entire contract ...
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 U.S. 617 (2018), was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States that addressed whether owners of public accommodations can refuse certain services based on the First Amendment claims of free speech and free exercise of religion, and therefore be granted an exemption from laws ensuring non-discrimination in public ...