Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
There are a number of requirements that a plaintiff must establish to have standing before a federal court. Some are based on the case or controversy requirement of the judicial power of Article Three of the United States Constitution , § 2, cl.1 .
Held that state taxpayers do not have standing to challenge to state tax laws in federal court. 9–0 Massachusetts v. EPA: 2007: States have standing to sue the EPA to enforce their views of federal law, in this case, the view that carbon dioxide was an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Cited Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co. as precedent ...
The Supreme Court of the United States has interpreted the Case or Controversy Clause of Article III of the United States Constitution (found in Art. III, Section 2, Clause 1) as embodying two distinct limitations on exercise of judicial review: a bar on the issuance of advisory opinions, and a requirement that parties must have standing.
Federal courts are now required to apply the substantive law of the states as rules of decision in cases where state law is in question, including state judicial decisions, and the federal courts almost always are required to use the FRCP as their rules of civil procedure.
While the court’s holding was narrow and limited to uncommon situations where the note and mortgage are separated, it is possible that borrower-defendants may seek to rely on the decision to ...
Ordinarily, one may not claim standing in a court to vindicate the constitutional rights of some third party. [3] The requirement of standing is often used to describe the constitutional limitation on the jurisdiction of federal courts to "cases" and "controversies."
Court orders that prohibited two criminal defendants from possessing firearms while they awaited trial were constitutional because they were in line with past restrictions on firearms, a federal ...
Federal courts typically use the following rules to dismiss disputes as nonjusticiable: The general rule against federal or state taxpayer standing. However, this rule has exceptions rooted in the First Amendment. The rule against third-party standing or third-party claims. The rule against generalized grievances. The zone of interest test.