Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Aug. 28—A company that provides oxygen equipment agreed to a $29 million settlement to resolve claims, brought by whistleblowers, that they were overbilling Medicare.
The kind of intentional overbilling a former Kirkland & Ellis lawyer recently admitted is rare, experts say. But when it does occur, it can be seen as another consequence of law firms ...
Dr. Ronald Bergman, who paid $800,000 to settle claims of overbilling Medicaid, claims his former lawyers gave bad advice about resolving the case Plastic surgeon Ronald Bergman sues his ex ...
Overbilling can occur when larger institutions or governments create errors in their calculations of how much various individuals may owe. [4] Banks and credit card providers can also overbill clients, or indirectly facilitate overbilling through the method by which they allow vendors to charge a client after the client has accented to having their card billed. [5]
Texas City Disaster#Legal case; Texas Youth Commission#ACLU lawsuit; The Brick#Lawsuit; The Chiari Institute#Lawsuits; Thomas Jefferson School of Law#2011 class action lawsuit against TJSL; Thomas M. Cooley Law School#Class action against Cooley; Three Cups of Tea#Lawsuits; TracFone Wireless#Class action; True (dating service)#:0
Attorney misconduct is unethical or illegal conduct by an attorney. Attorney misconduct may include: conflict of interest, overbilling, false or misleading statements, knowingly pursuing frivolous and meritless lawsuits, concealing evidence, abandoning a client, failing to disclose all relevant facts, arguing a position while neglecting to disclose prior law which might counter the argument ...
State Judge Daniel Coble found that even though Dawn Darby didn’t pay the erroneous medical bills Prisma sent her, she had suffered an injury because disputing unwarranted bills cost her time ...
CityTime was a New York City contract to build a timekeeping and payroll system for city employees, awarded to SAIC as a no-bid, $63 million contract in 2003. [1] In the following years, the contract ballooned to $700 million, as consultant rates were artificially inflated, and contract terms were adjusted to make the city responsible for "cost overruns".