Ad
related to: what makes a cite credible examples of one or two characters- Features
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Free Grammar Checker
Check your grammar in seconds.
Feel confident in your writing.
- Grammarly for Mac
Get writing suggestions across an
array of desktop apps and websites.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Features
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Citations are important in Wikipedia to ensure that information comes from actual, reliable sources (WP:V, WP:CITE). There are three preferred ways of citing sources: Footnotes; Footnotes with list-defined references; Shortened footnotes
Citing reliable sources serves several purposes: To ensure that articles are accurate and credible. To show that your edit isn't original research. To reduce the likelihood of editorial disputes, or to resolve any that arise. To enhance the overall credibility and authoritative character of Wikipedia. To credit a source for providing useful ...
imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles (e.g., some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references): an improvement because it makes the citations easier to understand and edit;
The easiest way to start citing on Wikipedia is to see a basic example. The example here will show you how to cite a newspaper article using the {} template (see Citation quick reference for other types of citations). Copy and paste the following immediately after what you want to reference:
This example is the most basic and includes unique references for each citation, showing the page numbers in the reference list. This repeats the citation, changing the page number. A disadvantage is that this can create a lot of redundant text in the reference list when a source is cited many times. So consider using one of the alternatives ...
Five references are provided early on: two textbooks, a specialized monograph on aldol reactions, and two review articles. Most readers would assume that the bulk of the statements in the comparatively short Wikipedia article could be verified by checking any of these references, and so it may only be necessary to provide additional in-line references for controversial statements, for recent ...
When editors talk about sources that are being cited on Wikipedia, they might be referring to any one of these three concepts: The piece of work itself (the article, book) The creator of the work (the writer, journalist) The publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press) Any of the three can affect reliability.
An example of usage in a published source is not of itself valid as a citation, because your selection of that example constitutes original work. If you are adding new content, it is your responsibility to add sourcing information along with it. Material provided without a source is significantly more likely to be removed from an article.
Ad
related to: what makes a cite credible examples of one or two characters