Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This template will categorize tagged articles in Category:Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes or a dated subcategory thereof. This template should only be used in the main (article) namespace. Do not place this template on talk pages, user pages, policies and guidelines, or other pages. This template is a self-reference.
Use this inline template to tag a statement that may not be entirely without bias. The editor placing the template must start a relevant talk page discussion. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Month and year date Month and year of tagging; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13' Example January 2013 ...
Use this template to indicate that the neutrality of an article is disputed. Follow this up with an explanation on the talk page. Template parameters This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Month and year date The month and year that the template was placed (in full). "{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}" inserts the current month ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
This template will categorize tagged articles in Category:Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes or a dated subcategory thereof. This template should only be used in the main (article) namespace. Do not place this template on talk pages, user pages, policies and guidelines, or other pages. This template is a self-reference.
For example, video captions such as, “POV: You’re a cashier confronting a Karen,” “POV: Your boyfriend is a gaming addict” or “POV: You caught her cheating.” Catch up on more teen slang:
Template usage notes. Use this template when you have identified a serious issue regarding WP:Neutral point of view in the introduction to an article. Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds this tag needs to discuss concerns on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies.
Go ahead. Do original research. We don't care. As long as you don't put your original research into an article, we don't mind. And don't insert another editor's original research, either. This is useful in an indirect way. Your doing original research may lead you to recognize ideas that direct you to sources you can cite.