enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: los angeles court case search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Los Angeles County Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_County...

    Los Angeles County Superior Court

  3. California superior courts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Superior_Courts

    California superior courts

  4. California Court Case Management System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Court_Case...

    Pursuant to California Rule of Court 2.506 and Government Code Section 68150(h), courts may impose fees for the costs of providing access to its electronic records. Several superior courts do so, including Alameda, Los Angeles, Riverside, Sacramento, and San Diego, and the fees have been criticized by Thomas Peele as exorbitant and ...

  5. Stanley Mosk Courthouse - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Mosk_Courthouse

    The Stanley Mosk Courthouse is a courthouse in Los Angeles, California home to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. It is located at 110 N. Grand Avenue and 111 N. Hill Street between Temple and First streets, lining Grand Park in the Civic Center in Downtown Los Angeles. The building was constructed in 1958 and has a floor area of 220,860 ...

  6. Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clara_Shortridge_Foltz...

    The Criminal Justice Center was dedicated as the Criminal Courts Building in 1972. / 34.054986; -118.24346. The Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center (formerly known as the Criminal Courts Building) is the county criminal courthouse in the Civic Center neighborhood of Los Angeles, California. It is located at 210 West Temple Street ...

  7. City of Los Angeles v. Patel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Los_Angeles_v._Patel

    City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Los Angeles law, Municipal Code § 41.49, requiring hotel operators to retain records about guests for a ninety-day period is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it does not allow for pre-compliance review.

  1. Ads

    related to: los angeles court case search