Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Climate change denial – involves denial, dismissal, unwarranted doubt or contrarian views which depart from the scientific consensus on climate change, including the extent to which it is caused by humans, its impacts on nature and human society, or the potential of adaptation to global warming by human actions.
A study published in PLOS One in 2024 found that even a single repetition of a claim was sufficient to increase the perceived truth of both climate science-aligned claims and climate change skeptic/denial claims—"highlighting the insidious effect of repetition". [123] This effect was found even among climate science endorsers. [123]
For example, climatologist Kevin E. Trenberth has published widely on the topic of climate variability and has exposed flaws in the publications of other scientists. [6] [7] [8] For past debates and controversies on scientific details see for example: History of climate change science#Discredited theories and reconciled apparent discrepancies ...
Story at a glance As the consequences of the planet warming grow ever more apparent, some cities are marketing themselves as “climate havens,” or refuges from extreme climate conditions. But ...
Climate change sceptics gained wide publicity in blogs and news media, [32] making allegations that the hacked emails showed evidence that climate scientists manipulated data. [8] A few other commentators such as Roger A. Pielke [47] said that the evidence supported claims that dissenting scientific papers had been suppressed. [48]
Global warming was the cover story of this 2007 issue of the liberal-leaning feminist Ms. magazine.. Media coverage of climate change has had effects on public opinion on climate change, as it conveys the scientific consensus on climate change that the global temperature has increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases.
Ms Greene went on to question why citizens are paying taxes allocated toward climate change when the funding will not help. She used the lack of taxes paid during the ice age as an example.
During Tuesday’s vice presidential debate between Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, each candidate made questionable, and sometimes downright false assertions.