Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia is a great place to start. Wikipedia is not paper , and that is a good thing because articles are not strictly limited in size as they are with paper encyclopedias. Articles steadily become more polished as they develop, particularly if one person is working on an article with reasonable regularity (inclining others to help the ...
See also why Wikipedia is so great. Learning to write in a neutral point of view is a useful intellectual exercise, since it requires cultivating humility and respect for the views of others. Wikipedia is a remarkable phenomenon of social organization; learning how things work here provides valuable lessons for many other kinds of organizations.
Wikipedia provides an opportunity for teachers to discuss the concept of free information, and freedom in general. Wikipedia is an opportunity to participate in an open community that relies primarily on mutual respect and cooperation, but which is not related to familiar authority figures some youths might tend to oppose.
Wikipedia for Schools is a selection of articles from Wikipedia produced by international children's charity SOS Children and most recently updated in 2013. It was originally produced as a learning resource for schools in countries where Internet access is limited, though it has also enjoyed significant success in the developed world.
Wikipedia for Schools (WfS), is a curated selection of Wikipedia articles targeted for use in offline primary and secondary classrooms. It has been curated to be an educational resource that promotes information literacy, digital, and research skills in remote, rural, offline communities globally.
Wikipedia:Core content policies: Brief summary and a bit of background on our core content policies. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia: Blunt and to the point laying out of what Wikipedia is; Wikipedia:Wikipedia in brief: Focuses on the encyclopedic nature of the project. Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset: A longer page with more detail.
Wikipedia can be a useful tool for directly intervening in this process using the following strategies: Teaching beginning researchers how to evaluate Wikipedia, within its editorial standards -- the guide File:Evaluating Wikipedia brochure.pdf is a good guideline for workshops or classes.
Is Wikipedia about to run out of funding and close down? Or did the accountant miss a zero off the last fiscal report? Will the Foundation discover $1,000,000 down the back of the sofa some time in the next four months? Or will we have to resort to running ads on Wikipedia? Would it be in the spirit of the project to do so?