enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tetration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetration

    3.75982 × 10 695,974 (7 823,543) ... are not zero, then function S has ... it is not known whether the positive root of the equation 4 x = 2 is a rational number.

  3. Rational root theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_root_theorem

    In the polynomial + the only possible rational roots would have a numerator that divides 6 and a denominator that divides 1, limiting the possibilities to ±1, ±2, ±3, and ±6. Of these, 1, 2, and –3 equate the polynomial to zero, and hence are its rational roots (in fact these are its only roots since a cubic polynomial has only three roots).

  4. Descartes' rule of signs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descartes'_rule_of_signs

    [2] [3] In the 1970s Askold Khovanskii developed the theory of fewnomials that generalises Descartes' rule. [4] The rule of signs can be thought of as stating that the number of real roots of a polynomial is dependent on the polynomial's complexity, and that this complexity is proportional to the number of monomials it has, not its degree.

  5. Zeros and poles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeros_and_poles

    If f is a function that is meromorphic on the whole Riemann sphere, then it has a finite number of zeros and poles, and the sum of the orders of its poles equals the sum of the orders of its zeros. Every rational function is meromorphic on the whole Riemann sphere, and, in this case, the sum of orders of the zeros or of the poles is the maximum ...

  6. Rouché's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rouché's_theorem

    Since has zeros inside the disk | | < (because >), it follows from Rouché's theorem that also has the same number of zeros inside the disk. One advantage of this proof over the others is that it shows not only that a polynomial must have a zero but the number of its zeros is equal to its degree (counting, as usual, multiplicity).

  7. Sylvester's sequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvester's_sequence

    s 0 is the nearest integer to E 2; s 1 is the nearest integer to E 4; s 2 is the nearest integer to E 8; for s n, take E 2, square it n more times, and take the nearest integer. This would only be a practical algorithm if we had a better way of calculating E to the requisite number of places than calculating s n and taking its repeated square ...

  8. Partial fraction decomposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fraction_decomposition

    In algebra, the partial fraction decomposition or partial fraction expansion of a rational fraction (that is, a fraction such that the numerator and the denominator are both polynomials) is an operation that consists of expressing the fraction as a sum of a polynomial (possibly zero) and one or several fractions with a simpler denominator.

  9. Exact trigonometric values - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_trigonometric_values

    In contrast, by the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem, the sine or cosine of any non-zero algebraic number is always transcendental. [4] The real part of any root of unity is a trigonometric number. By Niven's theorem, the only rational trigonometric numbers are 0, 1, −1, 1/2, and −1/2. [5]