Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The relation "≥" between real numbers is reflexive and transitive, but not symmetric. For example, 7 ≥ 5 but not 5 ≥ 7. The relation "has a common factor greater than 1 with" between natural numbers greater than 1, is reflexive and symmetric, but not transitive. For example, the natural numbers 2 and 6 have a common factor greater than 1 ...
For example, that every equivalence relation is symmetric, but not necessarily antisymmetric, is indicated by in the "Symmetric" column and in the "Antisymmetric" column, respectively. All definitions tacitly require the homogeneous relation R {\displaystyle R} be transitive : for all a , b , c , {\displaystyle a,b,c,} if a R b {\displaystyle ...
A relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. It is also a relation that is symmetric, transitive, and serial, since these properties imply reflexivity. Orderings: Partial order A relation that is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive. Strict partial order A relation that is irreflexive, asymmetric, and transitive. Total order
However, there is a formula for finding the number of relations that are simultaneously reflexive, symmetric, and transitive – in other words, equivalence relations – (sequence A000110 in the OEIS), those that are symmetric and transitive, those that are symmetric, transitive, and antisymmetric, and those that are total, transitive, and ...
An example of a left quasi-reflexive relation is a left Euclidean relation, which is always left quasi-reflexive but not necessarily right quasi-reflexive, and thus not necessarily quasi-reflexive. An example of a coreflexive relation is the relation on integers in which each odd number is related to itself and there are no other relations. The ...
The converse is not true: most directed graphs are neither reflexive nor transitive. A preorder that is antisymmetric no longer has cycles; it is a partial order, and corresponds to a directed acyclic graph. A preorder that is symmetric is an equivalence relation; it can be thought of as having lost the direction markers on the edges of the graph.
In terms of Kripke semantics, S5 is characterized by frames where the accessibility relation is an equivalence relation: it is reflexive, transitive, and symmetric. Determining the satisfiability of an S5 formula is an NP-complete problem. The hardness proof is trivial, as S5 includes the propositional logic. Membership is proved by showing ...
The relation "is equivalent to " is reflexive, symmetric (implies ), and transitive and thus defines an equivalence relation on the set of all norms on . The norms p {\displaystyle p} and q {\displaystyle q} are equivalent if and only if they induce the same topology on X . {\displaystyle X.} [ 8 ] Any two norms on a finite-dimensional space ...