Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A year later, he was made a judge in the Constitutional Court and, in June 2005, became Deputy Chief Justice. On 4 November 2013, Moseneke was appointed Acting Chief Justice during the long-term leave of Mogoeng Mogoeng. [5] Moseneke was regarded as one of the strongest judges on South Africa's Constitutional Court.
Morton Robert Berger (born July 2, 1951) is a former high school teacher from Phoenix, Arizona and a convicted child pornography collector. He was convicted in 2003 for possessing 20 pornographic images of children and sentenced to 200 years in prison without possibility of probation, parole, pardon or clemency.
Brian Curtin (b. 1951/52 [1]) is a former barrister and Irish circuit court judge, who was tried for possessing images of child pornography.After the case collapsed, the question of whether Curtin could continue as a judge became the focus of political and legal dispute.
From the New York side, the case went nowhere, despite Fluellen’s arrest driving Nedd’s car in Las Cruces, New Mexico in February 1975. He was charged in a string of armed robberies in New ...
Langa was born on 25 March 1939 in Bushbuckridge in the former Transvaal Province. [1] He was the second of seven siblings, with four brothers and two sisters. [2] [3] Their father, Simon Peter Langa, was a Zulu-speaking charismatic preacher from Natal, whose work for the Pentecostal Holiness Church had brought the family to Bushbuckridge temporarily. [2]
In May 2015, John R. Farrar, a federal inmate serving his sentence for a prior conviction for actual child pornography possession in 2007, was found with "seven hand-drawn images depicting the [sexual] exploitation of minor females" as well as "two hand-written books, describing sexual abuse of minors" on his workbench, and was indicted for six ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
It has also been a touchstone case for the Court's standard of review. Later cases cited it as reaffirming the principle by which the Court avoids ruling on the constitutionality of a statute if it can find a way to construe the statute such that the constitutional question is avoided. [note 5] In New York v.