Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
35 U.S.C. § 289. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the general title of a series of patent infringement lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics in the United States Court system, regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers. Between them, the two companies have dominated the manufacturing of smartphones ...
Looking to past fair use cases as precedent for the future. One possible path forward for companies and major content producers wanting to protect their intellectual property rights would be for ...
The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]
Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. Authors Guild v. Google 804 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2015) was a copyright case heard in federal court for the Southern District of New York, and then the Second Circuit Court of Appeals between 2005 and 2015. It concerned fair use in copyright law and the transformation of printed copyrighted books into an online ...
Strengthening it might. Satya Marar, opinion contributor. September 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM. With both presidential candidates’ renewed embrace of tariffs to punish geopolitical adversaries and ...
A court of appeals decision regarding trademark registration affirming the Commissioner of Patent's decision, and directing the clerk to certify its opinion to the Commissioner, is not final and appealable to the Supreme Court. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. 201 U.S. 166.
Patent Act of 1793, An Act for the Relief of Oliver Evans. Evans v. Eaton. 20 U.S. 356. March 20, 1822. Patent Act of 1793, An Act for the Relief of Oliver Evans. A patent on an improved machine must clearly describe how the machine differs from the prior art.
David Chang issued a public apology on his podcast amid criticism over his company Momofuku attempting to trademark the term “chili crunch.”. Chang, chef and founder of Momofuku, and Momofuku ...