Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. Developed by psychotherapist Carl Rogers and adapted to rhetoric by writing scholars Young, Becker, and Pike, the speaker seeks compromise, acknowledging positive aspects of ...
Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening.
Below, you’ll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to APA 7 th edition guidelines, with a particular emphasis on Rogerian elements. Click the image below to open a PDF of the sample paper.
The following are the basic parts of a Rogerian Argument: 1. Introduction: Introduce the issue under scrutiny in a non-confrontational way. Be sure to outline the main sides in the debate. Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another.
Rogerian Argument Outline. Introduce the problem and show why you and your intended audience are affected by the problem. Lay down the common beliefs, ideas and arguments between you and your listeners (if you are speaking) or readers (if you are writing a position paper).
Rogerian Argument Similarly to the Problem Solving structure, the Rogerian argument is structured the same but with more information. Using multiple sources, and not just two essays, it neutrally explains both sides of an argument along with the points they have in common and a possible compromise. INTRODUCTION:
Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a rhetorical and conflict resolution strategy based on empathizing with others, seeking common ground and mutual understanding and learning, while avoiding the negative effects of extreme attitude polarization.