enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Williams (2008) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams...

    United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography [1] (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child ...

  3. Republic of Philippines v. Pimentel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Philippines_v...

    Pimentel, [note 1] 553 U.S. 851 (2008), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which clarified the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as regards money damages sought by a foreign government, the Republic of the Philippines, via its Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG). The case stemmed out of disputes surrounding one ...

  4. Copyright Act of 1976 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976

    In the years following the United States' adoption of the UCC, Congress commissioned multiple studies on a general revision of copyright law, culminating in a published report in 1961. [7] A draft of the bill was introduced in both the House and Senate in 1964, but the original version of the Act was revised multiple times between 1964 and 1976 ...

  5. United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Code

    The United States Code is the result of an effort to make finding relevant and effective statutes simpler by reorganizing them by subject matter, and eliminating expired and amended sections. The Code is maintained by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel (LRC) of the U.S. House of Representatives. [ 2 ]

  6. Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of...

    The federal bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 201 (b), criminalizes the corrupt promise or transfer of any thing of value to influence an official act of a federal official, a fraud on the United States, or the commission or omission of any act in violation of the official's duty. [33] 18 U.S.C. § 201 (b) (1)– (2) provides:

  7. United States v. Rodriquez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Rodriquez

    United States v. Rodriquez, 553 U.S. 377 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act.Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the 6–3 majority, ruled that although the elements of a crime may not be considered "serious," sentence enhancements related to a defendant's prior record will bear on how the determination is made.

  8. Minnesota upsets No. 11 USC 24-17 on Brosmer's 4th-and-goal ...

    www.aol.com/minnesota-upsets-no-11-usc-031716254...

    Max Brosmer powered into the end zone for Minnesota from the 1-yard line with 56 seconds left, his third rushing touchdown of the game for a 24-17 win over 11th-ranked Southern California on ...

  9. Title 17 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_17_of_the_United...

    In the United States Code, Title 17 outlines its copyright law. [1] It was codified into positive law on July 30, 1947. [2] The latest version is from December 2016. This article is part of a series on the.