enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillespie_v._United_States...

    Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp., 379 U.S. 148 (1964), was a Supreme Court case that held that pre-trial appeals may be made on non-final issues if the trial judge, in his discretion, certifies a question of controlling law to the appellate court and the appellate court allows the appeal.

  3. Malone v British Airways plc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malone_v_British_Airways_plc

    Smith LJ, for the Court of Appeal held that the provisions were not aspirational, they were definite undertakings, but not an undertaking to individual employees. If it was individually enforceable, it would be ridiculous because then an individual could bring a flight to a halt by refusing to work under the contract terms.

  4. Forum non conveniens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forum_non_conveniens

    Nothing in this Act shall prevent any court in the UK from staying, sisting [staying or stopping a process, or summoning a party [14]], striking out or dismissing any proceedings before it on the ground of forum non conveniens or otherwise, where to do so is not inconsistent with the 1968 [Brussels] Convention or, as the case may be, the Lugano ...

  5. Mozambique rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozambique_rule

    In particular, R H Collins argued that the legislative change might remove the disability of the English courts in relation to local actions, especially where the parties were domiciled in England. In the Court of Appeal in the Mozambique case, a majority (Fry and Lopes LJJ, Lord Esher dissenting) took a similar view of the effect of that Act.

  6. Bogan v. Scott-Harris - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogan_v._Scott-Harris

    Bogan v. Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44 (1997), is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States where the court decided unanimously local legislators are entitled to the same absolute immunity from civil liability under Section 1983 for their legislative activities as are federal, state and regional legislators regardless of motive or intent.

  7. Chandos Construction Ltd v Deloitte Restructuring Inc

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandos_Construction_Ltd_v...

    APPEAL from Capital Steel Inc v Chandos Construction Ltd, 2019 ABCA 32 (29 January 2019), setting aside a decision of Nielsen J, Alta. Q.B., Edmonton, No. 24‑2169632, 17 March 2017. Leave to appeal granted, Chandos Construction Ltd v Deloitte Restructuring Inc in its capacity as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Capital Steel Inc, a bankrupt , 2019 ...

  8. Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_v._Napoleon_Community...

    Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools, 580 U.S. 154 (2017), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986 does not command exhaustion of state-level administrative remedies codified in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) when the gravamen of the plaintiff's lawsuit is not related to the denial of free ...

  9. Douez v Facebook - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douez_v_Facebook

    Hearing: November 4, 2016 Judgment: June 23, 2017; Citations: 2017 SCC 33, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 751: Prior history: Judgement for Facebook Inc. in the British Columbia ...