enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ecclesiastical Appeals Act 1532 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecclesiastical_Appeals_Act...

    The Ecclesiastical Appeals Act 1532 (24 Hen. 8. c. 12), also called the Statute in Restraint of Appeals, [3] the Act of Appeals and the Act of Restraints in Appeals, [4] was an Act of the Parliament of England. It was passed in the first week of April 1533. It is considered by many historians to be the key legal foundation of the English ...

  3. Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jarvis_v_Swans_Tours_Ltd

    The courts in those days only allowed the plaintiff to recover damages if he suffered physical inconvenience, such as having to walk five miles home, as in Hobbs' case; or to live in an over-crowded house, Bailey v. Bullock [1950] 2 All ER 1167. I think that those limitations are out of date.

  4. Appeal to consequences - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_consequences

    In law, an argument from inconvenience or argumentum ab inconvenienti, is a valid type of appeal to consequences. Such an argument would seek to show that a proposed action would have unreasonably inconvenient consequences, as for example a law that would require a person wishing to lend money against a security to first ascertain the borrower ...

  5. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillespie_v._United_States...

    Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp., 379 U.S. 148 (1964), was a Supreme Court case that held that pre-trial appeals may be made on non-final issues if the trial judge, in his discretion, certifies a question of controlling law to the appellate court and the appellate court allows the appeal.

  6. File:Criminal Appeal Act 1995 (UKPGA 1995-35).pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Criminal_Appeal_Act...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  7. Trump legal news brief: Nathan Wade resigns as special ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/trump-legal-news-brief-e...

    The full appeals court will weigh in on the bond amount and hear Trump’s appeal of Engoron’s ruling, but Fan, in Monday’s filing, said the chances of Trump winning were slim.

  8. Sturges v Bridgman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturges_v_Bridgman

    Sturges v Bridgman (1879) LR 11 Ch D 852 is a landmark case in nuisance decided by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.It decides that what constitutes reasonable use of one's property depends on the character of the locality and that it is no defence that the plaintiff "came to the nuisance".

  9. Court blocks key part of California law on children's online ...

    www.aol.com/news/injunction-against-california...

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said NetChoice, a trade group for companies that do business online, was likely to show that the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act ...