Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Florida v. Harris, 568 U.S. 237 (2013), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court addressed the reliability of a dog sniff by a detection dog trained to identify narcotics, under the specific context of whether law enforcement's assertions that the dog is trained or certified is sufficient to establish probable cause for a search of a vehicle under the Fourth Amendment to the United ...
Detection dog training in U.S. Navy military for drug detection An English Springer Spaniel on duty as a detection dog with the British Transport Police at Waterloo station. A detection dog or sniffer dog is a dog that is trained to use its senses to detect substances such as explosives, illegal drugs, wildlife scat, currency, blood, and contraband electronics such as illicit mobile phones. [1]
Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case which resulted in the decision that police use of a trained detection dog to sniff for narcotics on the front porch of a private home is a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and therefore, without consent, requires both probable cause and a search warrant.
The justices said the actions from the dog, Nero, constituted an unlawful search that violates the Fourth Amendment. Drug-sniffing dog put his paws on a man’s car. Idaho Supreme Court says he ...
A 60-year-old animal lover was beaten to death with a pipe on Christmas Eve while trying to save a dog that was being abused by a neighbor, witnesses said. Robert “Bobby” Cavanaugh, of Madison ...
A bomb-sniffing dog named Barni has won America’s Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) 2024 Cutest Canine contest. The 5-year-old German Shorthaired Pointer is an explosives ...
Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that the use of a drug-sniffing police dog during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, even if the initial infraction is unrelated to drug offenses.
It was the first case where diatom evidence was used to place a suspect at the scene of the crime and references the subsequent case from Season 2 Forensic Files episode "Micro-Clues", which also used diatom evidence. The evidence helped in the conviction of Christopher Green and Brian Davis, who were both 16 years old and were tried as adults ...