Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The latest badge promoting the Intel Core branding. The following is a list of Intel Core processors.This includes Intel's original Core (Solo/Duo) mobile series based on the Enhanced Pentium M microarchitecture, as well as its Core 2- (Solo/Duo/Quad/Extreme), Core i3-, Core i5-, Core i7-, Core i9-, Core M- (m3/m5/m7/m9), Core 3-, Core 5-, and Core 7- Core 9-, branded processors.
In April 2022, press reported on "hints" that Intel was working on Alder Lake-X. [14] [15] Intel officially announced the HX processor series on May 10, 2022, including Core i5, Core i7 and Core i9 models, [11] when Intel announced "seven new mobile processors for the 12th Gen Intel Core mobile family at its Intel Vision event. [16]
Quick Sync was first unveiled at Intel Developer Forum 2010 (September 13) but, according to Tom's Hardware, Quick Sync had been conceptualized five years before that. [1] The older Clarkdale microarchitecture had hardware video decoding support, but no hardware encoding support; [5] it was known as Intel Clear Video. Version 1 (Sandy Bridge)
Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file; Special pages
Ivy Bridge is the codename for Intel's 22 nm microarchitecture used in the third generation of the Intel Core processors (Core i7, i5, i3). Ivy Bridge is a die shrink to 22 nm process based on FinFET ("3D") Tri-Gate transistors , from the former generation's 32 nm Sandy Bridge microarchitecture—also known as tick–tock model .
Download QR code; Print/export ... Core i5-8365U and i7-8665U support Intel vPro Technology ... Price 1 2 4 Up Down Core i7 8665U: 4 (8)
The development of VP9 started in the second half of 2011 under the development names of Next Gen Open Video (NGOV) and VP-Next. [ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] The design goals for VP9 included reducing the bit rate by 50% compared to VP8 while maintaining the same video quality, and aiming for better compression efficiency than the MPEG High Efficiency ...
The quality the codec can achieve is heavily based on the compression format the codec uses. A codec is not a format, and there may be multiple codecs that implement the same compression specification – for example, MPEG-1 codecs typically do not achieve quality/size ratio comparable to codecs that implement the more modern H.264 specification.