Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Comcast customer Conal O'Rourke made headlines in October after his accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), fired him as a result of his complaints against Comcast. O'Rourke contacted Comcast several times to dispute overcharging and improper fees, but problems continued for a year without resolution.
Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir., 2010), is a case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia holding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have ancillary jurisdiction over the content delivery choices of Internet service providers, under the language of the Communications Act of 1934. [1]
Comcast claimed that the lawsuit was "an ordinary business grievance masquerading as a racial discrimination claim". [4] Around the time of this filing, Comcast was in the midst of trying to acquire Time Warner, and Time Warner had been named in Allen's suit, [3] but by April 2015, Comcast called
In an effort to find violations, the CFPB allows consumers to file complaints for harm caused by unfair, deceptive or abusive practices, including against a bank or credit union. Products and ...
Since top cable operator Comcast agreed to purchase No. 2 Time Warner Cable last week, public-interest advocates and others have been up in arms. The deal's numerous critics claim that a merger ...
The Supreme Court yesterday threw out a class action lawsuit against Comcast that had been brought by 2 million current and former Comcast customers citing competition concerns. A post on the ...
On August 1, 2008, the FCC formally voted 3-to-2 to uphold a complaint against Comcast, the largest cable company in the US, ruling that it had illegally inhibited users of its high-speed Internet service from using file-sharing software. The FCC imposed no fine, but required Comcast to end such blocking in 2008.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us