Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
SEC v. Goldman Sachs & Co, civ 3229 (S.D. of NY 2010) was a civil court case in front of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against Goldman Sachs (GS&Co) and Fabrice Tourre an employee of GS&Co relating to the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO.
Goldman Sachs Tower at 30 Hudson Street in Jersey City.. Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, has been the subject of controversies.The company has been criticized for lack of ethical standards, [1] [2] working with dictatorial regimes, [3] close relationships with the U.S. federal government via a "revolving door" of former employees, [4] and driving up prices of commodities through futures ...
Goldman Sachs's (GS) vigorous defense against the fraud charges filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission has begun. Goldman issued a detailed response to the charges, in which it flatly ...
For Goldman Sachs (GS), size and power led straight to arrogance, which ultimately tripped up the investment bank. As the most influential and imperious financial-services firm, Goldman apparently ...
Goldman Sachs Group Inc must again face a class action by shareholders who said they lost $13 billion because the Wall Street bank hid conflicts of interest when creating risky subprime securities ...
The Report cites investment banks as a major player in the lead up to the crisis, and uses a case study of two leading participants in the U.S. mortgage market, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. The case study found that from 2004 to 2008, banks focused their efforts heavily on RMBS and CDO securities, complex and high risk financial products ...
A daily look at legal news and the business of law: Goldman Sachs Throws VP Fabrice Tourre Under the Bus In my first look at the Securities and Exchange Commission's case, I noted that one of ...
• Fake email addresses - Malicious actors sometimes send from email addresses made to look like an official email address but in fact is missing a letter(s), misspelled, replaces a letter with a lookalike number (e.g. “O” and “0”), or originates from free email services that would not be used for official communications.