enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Peruta v. San Diego County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peruta_v._San_Diego_County

    Peruta v. San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" that "distinguish[es] the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way" (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 26150, 26155) before issuing a ...

  3. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of...

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (in case citations, 9th Cir.) is the U.S. federal court of appeals that has appellate jurisdiction over the U.S. district courts in the following federal judicial districts: District of Alaska. District of Arizona. Central District of California. Eastern District of California.

  4. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Housing_Council_of...

    Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC, 521 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008), [1] is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) did not apply to an interactive online operator whose questionnaire violated the Fair Housing Act.

  5. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

    17 U.S.C. § 501, 17 U.S.C. §106. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th. Cir., 2001) was a landmark intellectual property case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that the defendant, peer-to-peer file sharing service Napster, could be held liable for contributory ...

  6. Jablonski by Pahls v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jablonski_by_Pahls_v...

    Jablonski by Pahls v. United States, 712 F.2d 391 (9th Cir. 1983) [1] is a landmark case in which the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a mental health professional's duty to predict dangerousness includes consulting a patient's prior records, and that their duty to protect includes the involuntary commitment of a dangerous individual; simply warning the foreseeable victim is ...

  7. Sandra Segal Ikuta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandra_Segal_Ikuta

    Ikuta was born and raised in Los Angeles. She received her Bachelor of Arts degree at the University of California, Berkeley in 1976, having previously attended Stanford University for two years. Ikuta received a Master of Science degree in journalism from Columbia University in 1978. From 1978 to 1985 she was a writer and editor for many ...

  8. Ninth Circuit did not rule COVID-19 shots are not vaccines ...

    www.aol.com/ninth-circuit-did-not-rule-194822038...

    Instead, the appeals court allowed the workers' claims that the shots are not vaccines to go on to the fact-finding stage of the case, Reiss said, citing the 9th Circuit's opinion. The opinion ...

  9. United States Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Fish_and...

    The majority ruled in favor of the FWS and NMFS, reversing the Ninth Circuit's decision and remanding the case for further review. Barrett stated that the 2013 draft biological opinions were, within the scope of the deliberative process, "drafts of a draft" and not treated as drafts of a final view on the 2013 rule, and thus were protected ...